The Four Word Film Review Fourum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Return to my fwfr
Frequently Asked Questions Click for advanced search
 All Forums
 Film Related
 Films
 Waltz With Bashir

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert Email Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

Smilies
Angry [:(!] Approve [^] Big Smile [:D] Black Eye [B)]
Blush [:I] Clown [:o)] Cool [8D] Dead [xx(]
Disapprove [V] Duh [7] Eight Ball [8] Evil [}:)]
Gulp [12] Hog [13] Kisses [:X] LOL [15]
Moon [1] Nerd [18] Question [?] Sad [:(]
Shock [:O] Shy [8)] Skull [20] Sleepy [|)]
Smile [:)] Tongue [:P] Wink [;)] Yawn [29]

   -  HTML is OFF | Forum Code is ON
 
   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
demonic Posted - 12/09/2008 : 13:37:35
Waltz With Bashir

Seemingly no one else has mentioned this astonishing film yet on the Fourum, so I thought it was overdue a resounding recommendation, not only as one of the most visually beautiful films I've seen this year, but also in its final impact one of the most powerful.

I was particularly interested because of my love of animation, but I was also intrigued by the idea of an animated documentary, and one about the volatile, difficult wars of Israel and the Middle East. What I was concerned would be a gimmick was forgotten very quickly when it became clear that the animation was integral; Ari Folman, the director, is an artist and expresses himself through the pencil. It also perfectly represents the nature of a story about lost and suppressed memories; the thick lines and vivid colours take the way we remember events down to their essence. The problem of a twenty-five year age gap in the recollections of Folman's friends is solved as well; all the interviewees are drawn as their younger selves.

Their stories are frequently gripping and always visually arresting, flipping between Folman's present day search for his involvement in the Israeli/Lebanon war of 1982, specifically the night of an infamous massacre, and the memories of his fellow soldiers. It's a remarkably even handed account, even though there are no viewpoints from the opposing side. Folman pulls no punches when he comes to criticise the actions of his superiors and the government of the time. Knowledge of the war itself is not essential although I would have found a little more background useful, but then it is made clear that many of the young soldiers didn't have much of an idea what was going on at the time either.

SPOILERS!
[In a film full of wonders the last few minutes make the strongest point. Having become so numbed to the daily sight of atrocities and grief on the news it is almost impossible not to view such scenes with much more than pity and a vague interest. All the more surprising when the final shots of this film hit hard; the artifice and the beauty of the animation is pulled away to present real footage of grieving women following the massacre; it's an astonishing revelation and feels like a slap in the face. I'd defy anyone unprepared for this shift not to be profoundly moved].

If you get the chance, see this film. I highly recommend it.
15   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
Salopian Posted - 01/25/2009 : 14:39:46
I cannot agree that it is not political. Almost every point in every film has been made before, so that doesn't determine whether something is political or not.

Aesthetically, it's very good, but I don't think that's its particularly special quality. For me, it's the concept of animating it that's special, so that the documentary, autobiopic and dream portions can be unified.

By the way, I'm amazed that you've only just seen it. Surely it has been out there for ages?
ChocolateLady Posted - 01/25/2009 : 12:48:34
That said, my Finnish friend just told me that he's busy getting medical physio therapy equipment and prostesis into the West Bank right now. Its to help rehabilitate the Fatah members who had their legs shot off by Hamas when they were in Gaza.

What connects this to the thread and this film are the semi-similarities of what Hamas did and still does to Fatah members in Gaza and what the Lebanese Phalangists did to the Palestinian refugees in Sabra and Shatila. The big difference is that Hamas and Fatah are technically both allied against Israel (although they're not very cooperative between themselves), while the Lebanese Phalangists were basically allies with Israel during that war, and Israel might have been able to prevent that massacre (and certainly should have done more to stop it after it started).

This is not a political movie. It is one man's journey to light the blackout in his memory of what happened to him during that war. No one points any fingers that haven't been pointed and proven worthy of blame before. There's no making heros of villans or visa versa. Moreover, it is a piece of art that is worthy of every accolade and award it gets, and for that in particular, I hope as many people as possible get to see this movie.
GHcool Posted - 01/15/2009 : 19:24:09
quote:
Originally posted by ChocolateLady

He tells me that since Hamas took over, he has had many of his shipments confiscated and those things that they say they say they'll distribute, end up in unmarked trucks and who knows where these end up? (One source says the stuff gets sold to the highest bidders, but that's not totally documented.)




More than one source actually. A spokesperson from the United Nations Relief and Works Agency confirms this practice as does the Israel Defense Forces.
Salopian Posted - 01/15/2009 : 13:01:34
quote:
Originally posted by ChocolateLady

The thing is, they actually were democratically elected.

Yep, sorry if what I said was amiguous -- I didn't mean that their having been democratically elected was inaccurate, just that it was insufficient.
quote:
What kind of leaders do that to their own people?

Lots of kinds, unfortunately. Or, rather, the same kind in lots of places.
ChocolateLady Posted - 01/15/2009 : 12:36:40
The thing is, they actually were democratically elected. The people thought that Fatah had failed them and had been taking the money into their own pockets - which was true. Hamas ran on a platform of stopping that corruption and returning the money to the people, and helping those that needed it. And prior to those elections, Hamas actually did lots of good things for the Palestinian people. But as soon as they gained power, they too proved to be equally corrupt - if not more corrupt than Fatah. I remember the rioting in the streets several months after Hamas was elected, protesting that the money and social aid had stopped completely instead of increasing as Hamas had promised prior to the elections. Since their rise to power, they've become more and more militaristic, and their social conscience has dissappeared altogether.

I have a friend who has been working for nearly 20 years here with a Finnish NGO providing food and medications to Palestinians. He tells me that since Hamas took over, he has had many of his shipments confiscated and those things that they say they say they'll distribute, end up in unmarked trucks and who knows where these end up? (One source says the stuff gets sold to the highest bidders, but that's not totally documented.) Then last week he saw one of those trucks on the news as it was trying to enter Gaza via the "safe" road where the Israelis are allowing humanitarian assistance to get in. As he watched, he saw Hamas blow up the road with one of their rockets. From what he could gather, most of the contents of the truck were distroyed. What kind of leaders do that to their own people?
Salopian Posted - 01/15/2009 : 10:22:25
quote:
Originally posted by ChocolateLady

Sal, why not show this woman this video - I just saw it myself today and I think it will be far more effective than anything that an Israeli could ever show her.

Will do if she goes back onto Hamas being democratically elected. (To be fair to her, her opinion of them was not the core of her point of view, and she didn't say that Hamas were preferable to the Israeli state -- although she didn't say the reverse either.)
ChocolateLady Posted - 01/15/2009 : 06:43:23
Sal, why not show this woman this video - I just saw it myself today and I think it will be far more effective than anything that an Israeli could ever show her.
GHcool Posted - 01/14/2009 : 17:45:35
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian

quote:
Originally posted by GHcool

I hope you did persuade her in the end, but chances are a person with that kind of prejudice is a lost cause.

Oh yeah, I convinced her. I don't give up on things like that.



Thanks for that. Hopefully she won't make such statements in the future (at least not in your presence).
Salopian Posted - 01/14/2009 : 08:08:43
quote:
Originally posted by GHcool

I hope you did persuade her in the end, but chances are a person with that kind of prejudice is a lost cause.

Oh yeah, I convinced her. I don't give up on things like that. I also persuaded her that Hamas being democratically elected does not make it fine. I'm opposed to the bombing myself but that's all the more reason to use totally neutral terms and not see it in black and white, as anything else is counter-productive.
ChocolateLady Posted - 01/14/2009 : 07:16:53
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian

She hadn't seen it, in fact!



Well, there you go then. Sounds like someone who is totally clueless - on many counts. I guess you can slant anything any way you want, now can't you?
GHcool Posted - 01/14/2009 : 06:59:56
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian

Well, she was mainly livid about the Israeli action, and saw the film as being from a different viewpoint, which I would say was accurate enough. (I didn't find it particularly ideologically ambivalent.) However, it still of course was not meaningful to add it to her objections about the current events. She was easy enough to convince on that front; it took a bit longer to persuade her that it was neither accurate nor productive to describe anyone involved as "Nazis".



I hope you did persuade her in the end, but chances are a person with that kind of prejudice is a lost cause.
Salopian Posted - 01/14/2009 : 03:13:40
Well, she was mainly livid about the Israeli action, and saw the film as being from a different viewpoint, which I would say was accurate enough. (I didn't find it particularly ideologically ambivalent.) However, it still of course was not meaningful to add it to her objections about the current events. She was easy enough to convince on that front; it took a bit longer to persuade her that it was neither accurate nor productive to describe anyone involved as "Nazis".
demonic Posted - 01/14/2009 : 03:00:25
Wow. Getting livid about something you know nothing about is quite a feat.
Salopian Posted - 01/13/2009 : 16:24:46
She hadn't seen it, in fact!
ChocolateLady Posted - 01/13/2009 : 08:27:36
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian

quote:
Originally posted by ChocolateLady

An Israeli movie wins an award DESPITE the fact that we're on the world's shit-list at the moment. That must be a first for us!

Well, Fahrenheit 9/11 won awards while George Bush was unpopular.

I was talking to someone the other day who was livid at the supposed hypocrisy of this film in conjunction with the current Israeli action.


Strange reaction, actually. Sounds like she really didn't understand the film.

The Four Word Film Review Fourum © 1999-2024 benj clews Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000