| Author |
 Topic  |
|
|
Sean 
"Necrosphenisciform anthropophagist."
|
 Posted - 10/27/2009 : 04:16:40
|
From here.
Morality Play
I ended up 100% morally parsimonious.
Taboo
Your Moralising Quotient is: 0.00.
Your Interference Factor is: 0.00.
Your Universalising Factor is: -1.
So I'm 100% morally permissive.
I haven't tried the others yet, but I will at some stage.  |
|
|
w22dheartlivie 
"Kitty Lover"
|
Posted - 10/27/2009 : 08:55:24
|
Hmm.
I ended up at 78% morally parsimonious. I think my living experiences with health and assistance has changed how I might once have answered. My weakness had to do with family vs. strangers and geographical nearness. Curses, I've lost my hippie edge.
|
 |
|
|
ChocolateLady
"500 Chocolate Delights"
|
Posted - 10/27/2009 : 11:57:58
|
| Do the God philosophy one - that wasn't easy! |
|
|
|
duh 
"catpurrs"
|
Posted - 10/28/2009 : 04:43:33
|
Moral Parsimony Score is 72%
Taboo - The Results
Your Moralising Quotient is: 0.00.
Your Interference Factor is: 0.00.
Your Universalising Factor is: -1.
----
My son and I got a big laugh out of the question about sex with frozen chickens.
|
|
|
|
Sal[Au]pian
"Four ever European"
|
Posted - 11/05/2009 : 23:37:30
|
| 92% morally parsimonious. I didn't answer differently based on number, closeness or relationship, but I did distinguish between actively doing things and not actively stopping them. I know that in some philosophical frameworks there is no distinction but I don't go along with that. |
|
|
|
Sal[Au]pian
"Four ever European"
|
Posted - 11/05/2009 : 23:51:18
|
Your Moralising Quotient is: 0.29.
Your Interference Factor is: 0.25.
Your Universalising Factor is: 1.00.
I can only think that this comes from the fact that the chicken one said "assuming that there is no ethical problem with eating meat", whereas the cat one did not. That was the only one apart from the swing one that I said was wrong. I realise that the cat has not been killed for the purpose, but eating roadkill encourages people to think that eating meat is O.K. and supports their taste for it, and is thus wrong in itself. |
|
|
|
duh
"catpurrs"
|
Posted - 11/06/2009 : 09:51:28
|
quote:
Originally posted by Sa10pian
I realise that the cat has not been killed for the purpose, but eating roadkill encourages people to think that eating meat is O.K. and supports their taste for it, and is thus wrong in itself.
Reminds me of one of my visits to The South, when I saw a fella walking alongside the road, carrying fresh roadkill, presumably to take home for supper. I didn't think to stop and lecture him about the ethics of doing so.   |
|
|
| |
Topic |
|
Morality Quiz
