The Four Word Film Review Fourum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Return to my fwfr
Frequently Asked Questions Click for advanced search
 All Forums
 FWFR Related
 General
 FWFR Honorable Mentions?

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert Email Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

Smilies
Angry [:(!] Approve [^] Big Smile [:D] Black Eye [B)]
Blush [:I] Clown [:o)] Cool [8D] Dead [xx(]
Disapprove [V] Duh [7] Eight Ball [8] Evil [}:)]
Gulp [12] Hog [13] Kisses [:X] LOL [15]
Moon [1] Nerd [18] Question [?] Sad [:(]
Shock [:O] Shy [8)] Skull [20] Sleepy [|)]
Smile [:)] Tongue [:P] Wink [;)] Yawn [29]

   -  HTML is OFF | Forum Code is ON
 
   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
TitanPa Posted - 07/27/2007 : 20:37:03
Should Benj get royalties? Some people love FWFR that they actually mention the website when they try to copy us.

For Word Book Review

Are some of your reviews mentioned as Book to movie reviews?


Funny thing is, they ask for submissions...But no link on if anybody did submit.
14   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
thefoxboy Posted - 08/13/2007 : 00:36:24
quote:
Originally posted by Se�n

And I'm gonna claim "Icy dead people" for Titanic: Triumph and Tragedy.





quote:
Originally posted by Rovark
My first reaction is that there's a lot of films I've reviewed that were originally books.
In which case I take dibs on all my reviews to pass over.





Ditto

Sean Posted - 08/13/2007 : 00:26:55
And I'm gonna claim "Icy dead people" for Titanic: Triumph and Tragedy.
Rovark Posted - 08/12/2007 : 11:58:02
quote:
Originally posted by benj clews

Re: FWBRs... I've been considering setting up said site but running it without MERPs. This way it wouldn't take up any of my time (setting it up aside) or the other MERPs' time and it'd be an interesting test bed for an unmoderated four word site.

Thoughts? Would this be something anyone might want to submit to?



My first reaction is that there's a lot of films I've reviewed that were originally books.
In which case I take dibs on all my reviews to pass over and I can already think of a great review for Peter Brenchley's Jaws

GHcool Posted - 08/12/2007 : 09:03:42
quote:
Originally posted by benj clews

Thoughts? Would this be something anyone might want to submit to?



I would probably submit to a FWBR site much less than FWFR. Books are also more difficult because each individual reading a book has a different idea of what the book "looks like" whereas in film, what you see is what you get, and so everyone has the same frame of reference, which makes jokes easier to write for maximum appeal. Also, there is no standard Internet Book Database in the same way we have IMDb that we can check against. I suppose we can use Amazon, but then we get into the problem of editions, reprints, and translations. What about anthologies and reference books? Do pamphlets count? What about government publications and dissertations?

Most of the books that would work with the FWFR model have already been made into movies and those movies have been reviewed. I can imagine that there are famous books that are unlikely to be made into movies, but could lend itself nicely to the FWFR model (The Origin of Species and The Communist Manifesto come to mind).
TitanPa Posted - 08/12/2007 : 07:13:11
Reading books would take timer away from watching movies. Hmmmm I wonder if there is a website called Netboox.
Beanmimo Posted - 08/12/2007 : 01:53:14
quote:
Originally posted by benj clews

Re: FWBRs... I've been considering setting up said site but running it without MERPs. This way it wouldn't take up any of my time (setting it up aside) or the other MERPs' time and it'd be an interesting test bed for an unmoderated four word site.

Thoughts? Would this be something anyone might want to submit to?



Only one way to find out!!
BaftaBaby Posted - 08/12/2007 : 00:45:01
quote:
Originally posted by benj clews

Re: FWBRs... I've been considering setting up said site but running it without MERPs. This way it wouldn't take up any of my time (setting it up aside) or the other MERPs' time and it'd be an interesting test bed for an unmoderated four word site.

Thoughts? Would this be something anyone might want to submit to?



Sounds like a winner, benj!

benj clews Posted - 08/11/2007 : 23:01:27
Re: FWBRs... I've been considering setting up said site but running it without MERPs. This way it wouldn't take up any of my time (setting it up aside) or the other MERPs' time and it'd be an interesting test bed for an unmoderated four word site.

Thoughts? Would this be something anyone might want to submit to?
benj clews Posted - 08/01/2007 : 23:26:43
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian

I long ago suggested the possibility of F.W.B.R.s



More than that... I've owned the domain name for several years now!
Salopian Posted - 07/31/2007 : 09:01:34
I long ago suggested the possibility of F.W.B.R.s
Yukon Posted - 07/30/2007 : 20:54:05
I like this because the person actually gives credit to FWFR. Most people just rip off other people's ideas.
randall Posted - 07/28/2007 : 19:44:09
I wrote one that he read on the air, and the one he wouldn't.
GHcool Posted - 07/27/2007 : 22:21:05
quote:
Originally posted by TitanPa

Funny thing is, they ask for submissions...But no link on if anybody did submit.



He writes, "Please send your reviews to [email protected]," but I'm not going to send him squat.

Anyone can kick a football, but there's only one David Beckham.
thefoxboy Posted - 07/27/2007 : 22:08:50
He likes a few of my reviews.

The Four Word Film Review Fourum © 1999-2024 benj clews Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000